# NSFE training transcripts that I definitely did not make up at all.

**URL:** <https://sellersasksellers.com/t/nsfe-training-transcripts-that-i-definitely-did-not-make-up-at-all/7293>\
**Category:** Just for fun!\
**Tags:** nsfe, ai, amazon\
**Created:** [June 22, 2026, 3:35pm UTC](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/nsfe-training-transcripts-that-i-definitely-did-not-make-up-at-all/7293 "2026-06-22T15:35:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HobbesIsMyTiger](https://sellersasksellers.com/user_avatar/sellersasksellers.com/hobbesismytiger/32/8000_2.png) [@HobbesIsMyTiger](https://sellersasksellers.com/u/HobbesIsMyTiger)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2026, 3:35pm UTC](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/nsfe-training-transcripts-that-i-definitely-did-not-make-up-at-all/7293/1 "2026-06-22T15:35:11Z")

</div>

> Hello, and welcome to Amazon Forum Mod Training, day 3!
> 
> I see you all have your computers on, that’s good. Now everyone look to your right. That thing attached to the wire? That’s called a “mouse,” nobody knows why. It works like this, click click. Neat right? OK now you all try. Click click, good!
> 
> The mouse is used to pick which post you are responding to. Move the mouse until the little arrow thingy is pointing at the post and then, just like we practiced, click click! So easy.
> 
> Now look in front of you. That board-like thing with all the scary looking buttons is called a “keyboard,” genius name. Good news, you don’t need most of those buttons, so you can forget about them. The important ones are the “control” key, the “V” and “C” keys. Everything else is for nerds. The control key just says “ctrl” because the manufacturers are cheap and didn’t want to spend the ink, not like Amazon at all.
> 
> I’m sure you all remember from our session yesterday on “engagement,” the important thing about posts is that they have responses. Posts with no responses means low engagement on the forum, which means we all get fired, and I’m not gonna let you noobz pull me down, so we need to make sure there are enough responses on the forum.
> 
> When someone posts and you need to make sure there is a response, don’t waste time reading some rando whiner’s petty problems about losing all their money or whatever, just drag the mouse from the top of the question down to the bottom, this is called “highlighting”. Don’t worry if you miss parts, it probably isn’t important.
> 
> Then it gets tricky, because this is where the keyboard comes in. Without clicking the mouse, press and hold the control key, then cress the C key. Then let go of both. This copies everything you have highlighted. Don’t ask how that works, I don’t know. Something to do with magnets, I think.
> 
> Then click on the second screen where we have our cutting edge Amazon AI tool permanently locked open. If you try to close it there is an electric shock built into your chair, so unless you want 5,000 volts in the keyster, I don’t suggest it. Once the pointy thing is blinking in the AI screen, hold control but this time, press the V key. I know C looks like V on it’s side, but they really are different so don’t confuse them. This will copy the highlighted stuff into the AI without ever having to read it. So efficient.
> 
> The AI will think for just a few moments because it’s really smart, then it will tell you the best, and only possibly correct response to the seller’s post. Remember to call them sellers in the posts, we only call them fleshy ATM’s in internal communications. Then you reverse the process, copying the AI response onto the forum and racking up those sweet engagement metrics.
> 
> I know it sounds complicated, but you all lied convincingly about your skills on your resumes so I’m sure you can handle it, or at least fake it for a while. Just keep in mind that the main point here is _engagement_ so get those posts up. It’s not like anyone is gonna read this stuff anyway.
> 
> OK, let’s break into groups and practice this for a while, and then after lunch we will move on to the next engagement tool, Posting Sophomoric Questions to Make Amazon Sound Good.

Tell me I’m wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joebcrafts](https://sellersasksellers.com/user_avatar/sellersasksellers.com/joebcrafts/32/488_2.png) [@joebcrafts](https://sellersasksellers.com/u/joebcrafts)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2026, 5:27pm UTC](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/nsfe-training-transcripts-that-i-definitely-did-not-make-up-at-all/7293/2 "2026-06-22T17:27:21Z")

</div>

Trainee: Sir, if it is to copy and paste, why is it Ctrl C and Ctrl V? Shouldn’t it be Ctrl P to paste?

\*Traineer: Funny isn’t it. The people, because there was no AI yet, who wrote the code were lazy and liked being able to cut and paste without having to move their finger very far. So lazy.

\*Trainer misspelled on purpose. They were a trainee last week.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dogtamer](https://sellersasksellers.com/user_avatar/sellersasksellers.com/dogtamer/32/4766_2.png) [@Dogtamer](https://sellersasksellers.com/u/Dogtamer)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2026, 5:29pm UTC](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/nsfe-training-transcripts-that-i-definitely-did-not-make-up-at-all/7293/3 "2026-06-22T17:29:15Z")

</div>

> [@HobbesIsMyTiger](#):
>
> …  
> Then click on the second screen where we have our cutting edge Amazon AI tool permanently locked open.  
> …

Surely, you jest - which would be hilarious if it didn’t smack so closely to the facts on the ground.

Mnny\_Amazon’s 021225 discussion (edited, slightly, on 021126) “[Process Update] - Reporting Product Reviews” @ https: [//sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5) has been linked to in the SAS [before (link)](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/training-the-nsfe-mods/3545/269), and various members of the FMT-CMT have linked it in the NSFE over the ensuing 16 months; here’s a reproduction of the portion of that thread applicable to yet another AI hallucination that’s subsequently occurred with a more-recent post by Aria\_Amazon, which itself is reproduced below this:

> [@](#):
>
> **…**  
> 1. Visit [Customer Service](https://www.amazon.com/hz/contact-us/foresight/hubgateway)
> 
> 2. Select **Help with something else** (if this button is displayed)
> 
> 3. Select **Something else**
> 
> 4. Select **Amazon Community**
> 
> 5. Select **Customer Reviews**
> 
> 6. Select **Violations of our [Guidelines](https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=GLHXEX85MENUE4XF)**
> 
> 7. Select **I**  **need more help**
> 
> 8. Select **Send us an email** under **Email us**  
> **…**

Manny’s embedded “Customer Service” link, found at (‘broken’ for Discourse display) https: [//www.amazon.com/hz/contact-us/foresight/hubgateway](https://www.amazon.com/hz/contact-us/foresight/hubgateway), leads here:

> **[Help & Contact Us - Amazon Customer Service](https://www.amazon.com/hz/contact-us/foresight/hubgateway)**
>
> Visit the Amazon Customer Service site to find answers to common problems, use online chat, or call customer service phone number at 1-888-280-4331 for support.

Which is indeed the correct URL for the Buyer-side ‘Contact Us’ Home/Landing page; navigating there _ **will** _ in fact allow one to proceed through Manny’s step-by-step Product Review-reporting process.

On 061026, Aria made this reply to another NSFE discussion:

[https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/20d63524-bbe0-45d3-902a-2b06fb586346?postId=a48f7ba6-3cb1-4c20-94c3-4c1721a99306](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/20d63524-bbe0-45d3-902a-2b06fb586346?postId=a48f7ba6-3cb1-4c20-94c3-4c1721a99306)

For comparison w/ Manny’s tut, here’s the applicable portion of _her_ post:

> [@](#):
>
> **…**  
> Visit [Customer Service](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/support)
> 
> Select Help with something else
> 
> Select Something else
> 
> Select Amazon Community
> 
> Select Customer Reviews
> 
> Select Violations of our Guidelines
> 
> Select I need more help
> 
> Select Send us an email  
> **…**

Aria’s embedded “Customer Service” link is this (again, ‘broken’):

https: [//sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/support](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/support)

Which is _NOT_ the correct URL for the Buyer-side ‘Contact Us’ Home/Landing page; navigating there will _ **NOT** _ in fact allow one to proceed through Manny’s step-by-step Product Review-reporting process, as that’s _not_ a current function of Seller Support.

Hey, Andy - how’s that feverishly-fervid embrace of Artificial Idiocy workin’ out fer ya, pal?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dogtamer](https://sellersasksellers.com/user_avatar/sellersasksellers.com/dogtamer/32/4766_2.png) [@Dogtamer](https://sellersasksellers.com/u/Dogtamer)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2026, 8:34am UTC](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/nsfe-training-transcripts-that-i-definitely-did-not-make-up-at-all/7293/5 "2026-06-23T08:34:49Z")

</div>

> [@Dogtamer](#):
>
> Surely, you jest - which would be hilarious if it didn’t smack so closely to the facts on the ground.
> 
> Mnny[_sic_]\_Amazon’s 021225 discussion (edited, slightly, on 021126) “[Process Update] - Reporting Product Reviews” @ https: [//sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5) has been linked to in the SAS [before (link)](https://sellersasksellers.com/t/training-the-nsfe-mods/3545/269), and various members of the FMT-CMT have linked it in the NSFE over the ensuing 16 months  
> …  
> …  
> On 061026, Aria made this reply to another NSFE discussion:
> 
> [Please help us remove this fake review!!!!](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/20d63524-bbe0-45d3-902a-2b06fb586346?postId=a48f7ba6-3cb1-4c20-94c3-4c1721a99306)
> 
> For comparison w/ Manny’s tut  
> …

These things seem to bunch in clusters; just saw yet another of Xander’s malformed URLs in another post referencing Manny’s tutorial, from 060826:

[https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/1bed7c0f-3c97-4b48-9e50-f648852d6f4d?postId=336b947d-3446-40cf-b550-5a2e43477278](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/1bed7c0f-3c97-4b48-9e50-f648852d6f4d?postId=336b947d-3446-40cf-b550-5a2e43477278)

> [@](#):
>
> ##### **Xander\_Amazon**
> 
> In reply to: [Puyu\_Global’s post](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/1bed7c0f-3c97-4b48-9e50-f648852d6f4d?postId=1bed7c0f-3c97-4b48-9e50-f648852d6f4d)
> 
> 2 weeks ago
> 
> Hey there – I hear you, and I want you to know that Amazon does take review integrity seriously. We use a combination of machine learning models and human investigators to detect and remove reviews that violate our Community Guidelines, including those that are inauthentic, irrelevant to the product, or part of unusual review patterns.
> 
> If you believe specific reviews on your listings are suspicious or potentially abusive, here’s what I’d recommend as your next step: go to the product detail page, locate the review in question, and click the “Report” button directly beneath it. You can also report through our Contact Us path: Customer Service \> Something else \> Amazon Community \> Customer Reviews \> Violations of our Guidelines. For a full walkthrough, check out our post: [Process Update - Reporting Product Reviews]( [Seller Forums](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/forums/t/process-update-reporting-product-reviews/) ). Additionally, if you suspect another seller is targeting your listings, you can report this through Account Health \> Report Abuse.
> 
> Your feedback on patterns like sudden review spikes and timing inconsistencies is exactly the kind of signal we pay attention to. I appreciate you sharing this.

Xander’s link leads only to the NSFE’s Home/Landing page - because it lacks a Discussion ID, which in this case is “a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5” - rather than to Manny’s 021225 tut.

This is the link, ‘broken’ for Discourse display between the two superfluous Reverse Solidi (aka 'Backslash, the "" symbol) & the trailing Solidus (Diagonal Slash/Forward Slash/Oblique/Stroke, etc, - the "/"symbol) & again between the scheme/protocol & the pathname, that the AI supplied for Xander’s post; as we see, it has no Discussion ID included in the URL:

\ [Process Update - Reporting Product Reviews \]( https: [//sellercentral.amazon.com/forums/t/process-update-reporting-product-reviews](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/forums/t/process-update-reporting-product-reviews) /

The correct URL of course includes the Discussion ID “a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5” as the final part of the pathname (again, ‘broken’):

https: [//sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5](https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a9a6200a-7df7-4bb8-8b48-dc2926031da5)

* * *

What’s that they say - misattributed to Dr. Einstein (Albert, not Hermann) - about the definition of insanity?
