Merged topics!
thanksā¦I DID look before posting but obviously I failed.
With all due respect where itās due:
ā¦
Iām only human
Of flesh and blood Iām made
Human
BORN to make mistakes
ā¦
From @spoonyfork 's link:
Yes, Amazon will maliciously comply through āoverā correction and might start asking more Sellers for their own testing of their stock (rather than merely accepting manufacturer testing, as Amazon has already done in some categories), but naming Amazon as a distributor of its FBA products and responsible for recalls is the right call and levels its playing field with other retail competitors.
Honestly, so much of Amazonās āsuccessā has been down to its abilities to fudge rules that were un-fudgable for b&m retailersāfrom the locally-owned small niche businesses, to the big names.
Iām frankly surprised to see any accountability for Amazonās eagerness to make a buck by passing on any old poorly-made, human rights violating international products at the expense of the safety of US consumers who are used to more rigorous manufacturing guardrails.
I had a thread on OSFE with running links to lead-laden toys being sold on .com to US Buyers and continuing despite being notified that they were unsafe.
True, and we FBM Sellers will continue to be responsible for any and all liabilities associated with our products, as well as adhering to Amazonās vetting policies, procedures, and product requirementsāas will FBA Sellers continue to be, too.
The only change is that now Amazon-as-distributor must be more proactive and less weasely with product recalls under distributor requirements.
Amazon had argued that it was just a āthird-party logistics providerā
LOL at Amazon: Come onnnnnn. Weāre just, basically, like UPS, man.
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.