[image] On another topic DALL-E Expect IP issues This article from WSJ this AM. (Link bypasses paywall) https://www.wsj.com/articles/virtual-birkin-bags-on-trial-in-hermes-case-testing-ip-rights-11674962955?st=gph3sfz53ak7niv&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink Similar issues with Chat gpt an…

[image] TJB: Logic isn’t about true or not true. Something can be illogical but true at the same time or logical but false at the same time. You still seem to be implying that what ChatGPT said is untrue. So, please explain why. I am curious as to your reasoning. I have been asking all those …

I’m not implying anything about ChatGPT. I’m implying that stating what ChatGPT said is correct because it comes from ChatGPT is a fallacy. Logic is a framework of discussion that has nothing to do with something being right or wrong, it’s about the structure of the discussion. [image] Tried_T…

Except no one did that. This is precisely what Lake does repeatedly. You’re arguing against something no one did/said. No one said because the argument came from Chatgpt therefore it is correct. In which case, you would be right had there been not argument and only an appeal. But that didn’t happen…

[image] TJB: it’s the framework of saying something is correct because it came from ChatGPT. As @Tried_Tested said, no one said that. Instead of challenging the statement, you challenged something that no one here said, which is itself a fallacy. So, if we have been misled by ChatGPT – if Cha…

[image] Amazon_Seller: Just because ChatGPT said it, doesn’t mean it’s true. But the opposite is also true. Just because Chat GPT said it doesn’t mean it’s untrue. So, what part is untrue and why? ChatGpt is no more accurate than a google search. It is trained on unverified data. I use Co-p…

[image] lake: The use of ChatGpt as a source opens questions about the competence of the person who uses it. :wink: Uh oh… [image] USPS Issues / USPS.com Issues Co-pilot (ChatGpt) says

[image] lake: … The use of ChatGpt as a source opens questions about the competence of the person who uses it. It does not increase the chances of the statement being correct. It is opinion just as a statement based on an individuals personal knowledge, but is second hand unverifiable data inst…

[image] papy: [image] lake: The use of ChatGpt as a source opens questions about the competence of the person who uses it. :wink: Uh oh… Co-pilot (ChatGpt) says My identification of Co-pilot as a source was a warning that this is questionable data. It was not as an authority, Sorry …

[image] lake: ChatGpt is no more accurate than a google search. It is trained on unverified data. So tell us again what part of its answer within this thread is inaccurate. It is so inaccurate that you have yet to identify the inaccuracy. The debate here is on the economy (at least it was un…

A Nay vote from me on the 120225 “About AWS” blog post announcing the Nova 2 family of dufuses: Announcing Amazon Nova 2 foundation models now available in Amazon Bedrock - AWS Early signs that this launch was coming seemed to’ve fueled some fairly-broad speculation among certain industry observer…