[Fortune] Exclusive: Chinese suppliers are offering U.S. Amazon sellers a tariff solution—but it’s not legal

President Trump’s China tariffs are not just roiling the operations of Amazon sellers and other U.S. retailers big and small. They’re also upending the businesses of Chinese manufacturers and distributors supplying goods to the U.S. from the other side of the world.

Now, some of these suppliers are trying to keep their businesses humming by offering a simple—but illegal—solution to U.S. Amazon sellers: lying about the value of the Amazon merchandise you are importing to the U.S. in an effort to lower the duties you’ll have to pay under the new slate of tariffs.

Yes, that sounds a lot like customs fraud.

In emails and WeChat messages viewed by Fortune, around a half dozen Chinese suppliers proposed such illegal workarounds to executives from a mid-sized household goods brand with a large presence on Amazon.

“Many US companies use a lower value invoice to make customs clearance to reduce the tariff,” one supplier wrote to the U.S. brand. “You can think about it.”

“We can revise the declared value on commercial invoices to help duty costs,” another said.

Some also proposed another workaround called Delivery Duty Paid or DDP shipping. In this scenario, the supplier would handle getting the goods through customs, rather than the U.S. brand, and lie about the value of the shipment essentially on the brand’s behalf. The goal of this, at least in part, would be to create an artificial buffer between the U.S. seller and customs.

“Some have mentioned that they are doing this already for many of our competitors,” the founder of the household goods brand told Fortune. He requested anonymity to speak freely about the situation and to not burn long-time suppliers whose manufacturing he may still need. One of his suppliers said in a message viewed by Fortune that some China-based Amazon sellers use the same strategies to lower their custom bills.

The frenzied behind-the-scenes activity comes during a whirlwind week in which President Trump unleashed a tariff attack against countries across the world, before partially backtracking on some tariffs as the global economy threatened to collapse. But China is the exception, with most U.S. imports from the country now carrying a whopping 145% tariff. As a result, suppliers, retailers, and brands with supply chains linked to China are frenetically searching for solutions.

“I am worried for smaller importers that don’t understand the legal trouble they can get into by following their suppliers’ problematic advice,” the founder said.

In other messages viewed by Fortune, some suppliers are offering to lower their wholesale prices, but only moderately. Some also said they are considering building out manufacturing facilities in other non-U.S. countries with lower tariffs than China, but over time.

Many U.S.-based Amazon sellers have long complained to this reporter that they suspect some of their China-based rivals undervalue their imports as a cost-savings tactic. Then, this week, the issue exploded into public view across the Amazon seller community when a China-based consultant published a post about the current mindset of Chinese Amazon sellers, and stated that “the declared value of goods in a typical container from China to the U.S. usually ranges from $5,000 to $10,000.” Many U.S. Amazon sellers told Fortune that the number is unbelievably low, especially for the home and garden category, which includes furniture products, that the consultant operates in.

“They aren’t held accountable for customs fraud, and the tariffs will drastically increase their competitive advantage,” the U.S.-based household goods entrepreneur said of China-based rivals that intentionally mislead customs about the value of their imports.

8 Likes

I mean this is not a new SOP

4 Likes

This is not a new SOP at all…anything to feed content people can whack off to (since time immemorial so nothing new) - there are literally 1000’s of China and US based seller on AMZN and it’s pretty much standard in most niches - there is a necessary component of competition that calls for this. This is very much similar to the labored protests ASV makes about literal packaged shiit being sold on amazon as a health product and yet only certain sellers are subjected to overt scrutiny whereas others are getting away with murder so to speak.

4 Likes

Sounds about like the email promotion we received.

3 Likes

A couple of interesting public comments on that LinkedIn post


3 Likes

Or actually… Sad

4 Likes

The upside is that this is creating a whole class of Chinese merchants who are becoming adept at breaking laws. They will help drive an eventual downfall of the CCP.
The downside of this is that it is creating a bunch of both American and Chinese merchants who regard breaking the law as a standard way of doing business. In the long run that is bad for everyone.

3 Likes

BTW, I suspect that cryptocurrency is facilitating this tax evasion.

When the products are reported to be sold at a substantially lower price, all of the documents must match, including the banking details. Otherwise the evasion is uncovered very easily.

But the manufacturer must get his money somehow, and the transaction should be untraceable so that nobody gets caught. Cryptocurrency fits this requirement perfectly.

A side effect of this is that the manufacturer has also evaded Chinese income tax. Rates for that are anything between 0 and 45%. ( 31K to 57K are taxed at 25%; 58K to 90K at 30%; 91K to 131K at 35%; over 131K at 45% )

Evading taxes at both ends is becoming very profitable, and those who do not will probably be run out of business by those who do.

3 Likes

I think some of this is getting blown out of proportion. Undervaluing invoices has been going on for years, way before the current tariff chaos. It’s not new behavior, it’s just getting more attention now. And from the Chinese supplier side, it’s not really seen as “cheating," more like working around what they view as an unfair system. Survival, not scandal.

On the crypto point; Bitcoin’s actually not great for hiding anything. It’s fully traceable on a public ledger, and firms (and governments) track it constantly. If anything, China cracked down on crypto because it threatened their control over capital and currency, not because of tax evasion.

This isn’t really about crypto or lawlessness. It’s about two economies with broken incentives trying to keep trade alive in a messy system.

2 Likes

Privacy coins can’t be scaled because then they trigger trails.

1 Like

What about HawkTuah Coins?

Asking for a friend

6 Likes

At risk of stating the obvious, putting a lower value on the goods shipped means that there is less shipper/handler liability if the shipment is lost or destroyed.

The other problem is that one’s books (Cost of Goods Sold) won’t match the import paperwork unless one throws away the Pro-Forma Invoice that goes with the goods in the shipment, and keeps only the real invoice that is paid.

So, the “criminal conspiracy” now involves purchasing, the warehouse staff, and the bookkeeper. In the movies, the bookkeeper always talks when the police get threatening.

If your COGS don’t match your only proof of COGS (the invoices) then you have to use your payments and the RFPs/Quotes to justify your COGS. Not sure how that will work for you, I am not a bookkeeper.

3 Likes

Probably a good thing. All those importers can blame the bookkeeper for all the problems at sentencing… :grin:

2 Likes

The issue has always been China, They copy patents ( mine has been copied and Amazon was notified - nothing done.) They will do ANYTHING to keep USA buyers, lies…thats nothing to them. The flood gates opened up when Amazon was willing to recieve anything from anywhere. I say shut China down from Amazon.

7 Likes

First off, welcome to SAS!

As a contractor, I have seen your product, and the others.

Yours (IMO) is a way better product quality wise. You took the time to custom work a 1900 plate AND fit it in a 1900 4x4 deep box. If I didn’t have a 24kw whole home, I would be using your unit. But not everyone sees quality.

Yes they will

8 Likes

Why do you think such enterprises hire “The Accountant” to do the books?

4 Likes

Glad to see you found us, EZ - Welcome to the SAS!

I second the notion.


On a side note, I recall having seen, about a month ago, one of your NSFE discussions where Bryce_Amazon of the FMT-CMT (‘Amazonese’ for “Forum Moderation Team”, rebranded as “Community Management Team”) gave you faulty advice regarding the ability to have all FBA Customer Returns automatically routed back to your facility.

Bryce apparently doesn’t know that the latest iteration of the various Grading Opt Out Pilot Program/FBA Customer Returns Removal Pilot Program/Automated Returns Trials initiatives which Amazon has dabbled with over the last decade, the “FBA Returns Evaluation & Ownership Settings” Program, was launched more than two years back (early March of 2023); it is explained in the recently-renamed SHC (“Seller Help Content”) policy page FBA returns evaluation and ownership settings (link).

There are other members of the SAS who participate in this program (our friend @ASV_Vites comes to mind), and they would likely be better positioned than I am to comment on its performance; we ourselves don’t participate because the program’s TOS @ Terms and conditions for disabling returns evaluation (link, SHC) absolves Amazon, the carrier, and the buyer of ALL liability, and that’s a deal-breaker for us - but given the nature of the regulatory requirements you have to adhere to with your high-quality product, I’d think that this program might be something worth considering.

In any event, glad to see ya - slowly but surely, they’re puttin’ the band back together again.

5 Likes

Sharing this update here from @booknut7. If they continue to turn away ENTIRE SHIPMENTS for one “error” in valuation, then suppliers are going to lose honest customers, so of course they will be swift and harsh to curb that.

7 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.