Is there a listing report that includes the date the SKU was created? I can see that data is stored on the manage inventory page, so logically there has to be a report with that info, right?
It will show on the Manage Inventory Page is you select it to show under the preference settings (tab is top right in the menu servicing the ASINs).
That page isnāt exportable though. The big bosses want a report on how many items were created on each day for the past year. I have two stores, and I really donāt want to manually count how many items were created on x date.
There is an Category Listing Report available in Inventory Reports - Select Report Type [link]
In column AFA in my report it shows Offering Release Date (US).
Yep ā¦ the All Listings Report in the drop down does have the date first offered on Amazon.
It comes out as a text file so one would have to use excel to open it up to be able to filter.
I agree with our friend Marbles* to use your CLR/RFRs to satisfy your needs, with one caveat:
What youāre looking for is most-likely to be found ONLY in the report generated in the first dropdown-menu selection, āAll.ā
The āLocal Label Nameā (i.e., the āhuman-readable nameā) of the field youād want to filter for is āOffering Release Date (US)ā for the US Marketplace in which youāve created Offer-Listings in the Amazon Global Catalog, while the
āField Nameā (i.e., the āmachine-readable nameā of that header is āpurchasable_offer[marketplace_id=ATVPDKIKX0DER]#1.start_at.valueā,
Offer-Listings in other of Amazonās Regional Marketplaces will vary from this format, even if only the score that they all Have separate Marketplace IDs, but itās also possible that the āhuman-readable nameā can vary because different Amazon Teams are so well-siloed that standardization of nomenclature becomes but a mere casualty of unintended consequences.
Youāve mentioned having two SoA Accounts, QiaD - may I ask if they are both registered in the same Global Marketplace, or as separate accounts in different Regional Marketplaces?
*
Well, mostly I agree.
Any association of me with the term āgreatā is entirely inapplicable, as the better Ā½ will readily attestā¦