I mean itās so long OSFE would have flagged it for to many words too fast (cut/paste) and no one (nsfe or osfe) is gonna read it!
TLDR: I know I said Iām guilty, but I did it with the best of intentions because other people are worse than me.
I think this is a marvelous piece of marketing fluff.
Ed and ASGTG are generous fighters for truth, justice and the American way of life.
And the lawyers and consultants were out to sabotage all of the selfless people who were undermining their taking advantage of the poor, blameless sellers who were being abused by the heartless, unfeeling Amazon.
Pardon me, while I get up to get a clean hankie.
I wish that was what it said.
What it actually said was āIām an angel, and I was framed for being too nice and helpful and wonderful and fantastic and āaltruisticā and charitable and caring and nice to puppies and the only decent human in the entire world with the exception of you, the reader, who are personally and intentionally attacked by these forces of evil by removing me from my position of helping you deal with the horrors that exist solely to crush you. Thatās right, they are out to get me because they are out to get you and Iām the only one that might have stopped them.ā
Heās Jerry Maguire with the memo and weāre all Rod Tidwell. ![]()

Darn. I wasted a flag since I didnāt see it was already flaggedā¦
Canāt bring too many shovels to a massive pile of BS.
Maybe Edās law school did not teach about the Alford Plea, recently used by Hunter, or he forgot about it,
*According to University of Richmond Law Review, "When offering an Alford plea, a defendant asserts his innocence but admits that sufficient evidence exists to convict him of the offense
Different Ed apparently, Yeah there are two. The one referenced in the spluge piece above does not have a law degree.
His rehabilitation campaign is clearly kicking into gear. I wonder if he is writing a book next.
Ed Rosenberg has really gone off the rails, responding just now to this year-old reddit comment.
This SellersAskSellers thread seems to be getting to him because he mentions us specifically.
Iām going to park a private members-only companion topic over in
SAS Confidential (members only) with the update. ETA: (PRIVATE)
Amazon consultant Ed Rosenberg bribery case updates
Let the record reflect, GUILTY.
No matter the pr spin or how many times he says otherwise, the word GUILTY departed his lips in a court of law, and are recorded as such.
And thats something he has to live with now and for the rest of his life.
Period.
Looks like Ed posted a reply to himself then deleted, ![]()
This is an interesting read reposting from Medium by Albert Leon
Interesting because itās about you? Maybe the NSFE doesnāt know Edās username? Come on Susan, SaS stuff is nuked in minutes and this spam is let to rot overnight? Or maybe they are letting it go because heās not winning the
Ratio, LOL
Embarrassing Ed.
I mean letās put the cards on the table here.
If Edās life was going perfectly right now, he wouldnāt be carpetbombing reddit, nsfe, and who knows where else with this āstory.ā
In my personal opinion it smells like an informational life advertisement.
Wonder if he posted it to his Facebook groups.
The good news is, hopefully his time spent trying to rehab his reputation means he is too busy to re-commit his law breaking behavior.
He was probably a young man who was left burning for attention growing up, and after starting a āfirst sale doctrineā cult giving him a group of attention givers, he is having a hard time being a convicted felon and disgraced, caught-selling-questionable-items appeal writer for the bottom of the barrel sellers on Amazon.
Lets face it, a simple google search will put off any potential client from relying on his āprofessionalā judgement. And any reading of his threads reek of pathetic excuses written to justify said bad judgement.
He repeatedly implies⦠Amazon is doing bad things, therefore it is okay for me to do bad things, to correct Amazons decisions to block sellers from selling trash on their platform, they should not have been selling in the first place.
Ed has deeper roots in the broad Amazon seller community than I and many of us do.
I never felt a connection with him or the sellers who had a strong bond with him. You can easily postulate reasons for that, which can reflect badly on them or me.
Did he invest time and effort in the community as he saw it? yes he did.
Is it a Shakespearean tragedy that ended with him in court? Quite possibly.
I am sure this has left a hole in his life.


