[WSJ] Amazon Is Better Prepared for the Trade War Than Investors Think

The company’s size and global reach give it muscles to flex even in a sour economy

WSJ 04/18/25 Asa Fitch, Dan Gallagher

When markets are moving fast, it’s often better to be small and nimble. Sometimes it’s best to be huge and all over the place.

This is the case for Amazon.com and its stable of businesses. These include a cloud-computing operation, a streaming platform and an online retail business with a globe-spanning supply chain and hundreds of millions of customers.

Amazon’s retail business is particularly affected by the escalating trade battle with China, which currently includes a 145% tariff on imports to the U.S. Around 25% of products Amazon directly sells originate in China, Morgan Stanley estimates. And more than half of Amazon’s sales last year were in North America.

But the size of that global operation gives it options many competitors lack.

The company’s large logistics footprint and relationships with global suppliers mean it can move inventory and production to countries not as hard hit by tariffs. The company canceled some vendor orders from China after the tariffs went into effect, a prelude, potentially, to a geographic shift.

Amazon’s heft also gives it leverage to squeeze suppliers and keep prices from getting out of hand. That could open the door for Amazon to gain market share, Truist analyst Youssef Squali said in a note.

The company also used its sizable financial muscle to buy up inventory strategically in advance of the tariffs, Chief Executive Andy Jassy said in an interview with CNBC last week.

Amazon’s stock has had a rocky ride since tariffs on China went up on April 2. It is down 12% since that day’s market close and now trades at around 26 times forward earnings—its premium to the S&P 500’s multiple is at its lowest in a decade. The stock was near 38 times forward earnings just before tariffs hit.

Many small and midsize businesses that use Amazon’s storefront to sell their wares manufacture in China and export to buyers in the U.S.

Many of the small and midsize businesses that use Amazon’s storefront to sell their wares manufacture in
That suggests considerable stress is already baked into Amazon’s price, even more than some competitors who appear equally, if not more, vulnerable.

For example, Amazon’s multiple is around a 23% discount to that of Walmart, according to FactSet data. The traditional retail titan last week reaffirmed its quarterly revenue guidance despite the new tariffs, also a testament in part to its size. It has also been building up its own e-commerce business to better compete with Amazon.

Not that there won’t be pain. The small and midsize businesses that use Amazon’s storefront to sell their wares could hurt Amazon most. Many of those businesses manufacture in China and export to buyers in the U.S.

They don’t have large margins to absorb higher costs, nor are many able to move production and inventory around the world. Some may end up raising prices. Others may go out of business.

And those businesses are important to Amazon’s bottom line. More than 60% of goods sold on Amazon.com are from third-party vendors, and the company drew in about $156 billion from charging them fees last year. Operating margins from third-party sellers have historically run at about 20%, versus a low single-digit amount for direct sales, analysts estimate.

If their prices rise and sales decelerate—post-tariffs, Morgan Stanley expects they’ll slow to 6% growth this year from 11% last year. That could take an outsize bite out of Amazon’s profit.

A downbeat consumer is another risk for Amazon. Americans expect prices to increase because of tariffs, and many are making big purchases and stocking up on staples ahead of a souring outlook.

Yet even in a strained economy, people need to buy things. And consumers tend to be more price-sensitive in times of high inflation and slowing economic growth.

Amazon has a solution for that: its Everyday Essentials business where revenue has already been accelerating. That bucket of personal-care, health and grocery products grew 90% faster than the company’s other categories last year, pointing to share gains, Citigroup analysts said in a note.

Luxury retailer LVMH’s finance chief confirmed on Monday that Amazon is taking market share in personal care, griping that Amazon’s aggressive pricing was slowing growth for its Sephora personal-care line in the U.S.

Another dimension of Amazon’s size—the diversity of its revenue streams—should offer investors further comfort against a weaker backdrop.

The company’s cloud-computing business, called Amazon Web Services, supplied 17% of overall revenue last year. But it accounted for more than half of its operating income because of its wider profit margins.

Amazon also has a large digital-ads business, second only to Google and Meta Platforms. Its video-streaming service has a reach nearing that of Netflix.

Amazon’s fortunes in retail are tightly tied to Advertising (PPC).

That may be the first cut sellers make if pressured by costs.

That’s what I would be concerned about if I were Amazon.

Lot of Alibaba-Distributor sourced goods at 90% base margins that allow for big spending in PPC to sell that junk.

If suddenly that inventory costs 145% more, the $ to advertise dries up.

I agree with the article but not sure the author is aware of how things really work and the above caveat.

With referral fees at 10-15% (pretty small) - inflation would help Amazon in that regard with no additional costs for them, but it won’t make up for the curtailing of PPC spend in order to survive at the seller level.

I don’t think Amazon has anything to worry about. Between AWS and ad revenue they have enough money move around if they have to.

Plus they have all the air and ground support to step in when the post office takes a dump and can longer function :joy:

This is exactly what I’m seeing. Bid costs have gone way, way down (at least for my category). One item used to be a $2.10-2.20 PPC cost to win is now in the $1.20-1.25 range now. My sales are increasing slightly but the really nice thing to see is my ad spend is down about 30% at the same time.

We are seeing it too. We have a weekly budget. We can’t even spend it.

That’s a good thing!

With that said, I’d rather spend more on PPC and less on real life…

So, my takeaway is that while Amazon the monolith is in a reasonable position to weather global trade chaos, most 3P Sellers on Amazon are…not so much. :downcast_face_with_sweat:

As always, it is hard to generalize.

LVMH comments come with a backdrop of a disappointing earnings report which showed problems with more than Sephora. Being able to name a competitor as a reason for poor performance is a step in proposing they know how to solve a problem.

Chinese sourced goods have no requirement for the manufacturer to sell the products in the same quantity at the same price to all buyers. This is unlike goods sold in the US. Some of these Amazon sellers of Chinese product are likely to have more margin than others.

Not all Chinese products offered on Amazon are going up yet. Some appear to be going down in price. Are these sellers clueless or are these sellers liquidating and abandoning the US market.

The term investor is misleading. The price of Amazon stock and most other stocks are governed by demand from investors and the actions of traders AKA speculators. Investors are far more in need of comfort than speculators who regularly bet based on if they think they can win - whether the company is doing well or poorly.

As many people know, Warren Buffet, one of the most esteemed investors in the US has been liquidating his position in many companies, most prominently - Apple. Apple is not at risk of going out of business due to the China tariffs but it faces increased pressure but they were not attractive to Mr. Buffet before these tariff gyrations.

Amazon’s mix of items Sold by Amazon has already shown signs of shifts. Name brand items which were sold for many years are disappearing. I expect we will be told of some new initiative in due time.

I would not invest in Amazon but I have never invested in Amazon because I do not like its P/E ratio. But Amazon under Jassy is a more attractive company to me than Amazon under Bezos. It p’s away less money, and is a stronger retailer.

Looks like Trump blinked first. Talks of de-escalation with China, coupled with ramp down on Fed Chair firing has the markets feeling good…

I bought my wife a car today because of this ■■■■. Should have waited… The selection of available cars is next to nothing at the moment. Toyota had nothing decent left. Just a few models with cloth seats and hubcaps… I didn’t even know there were new cars sold at this point with hubcaps…

Ended up with a Forester Hybrid… Sorry @VTR lol

Last one they had avail that wasn’t sold… It was sold but deal fell through so it wasn’t on their site as avail so that’s why it was avail…

Fanboy to the rescue…

I trust nothing these days tbh.

Your wife needed a car. She now has a car. You did that for her, the best you could right now. It’s a win.

Chinese State Media is loving Trumps statements right about now.

my sentiments exactly - :poop: is so vague because there is no real plan, just wild antics - which gets leaked and then you blame the CEO of the messaging app! Da fuq? And or expect the bank to bail you out when you go bankrupt in your ventures - except the bank is the Fed and the venture is a nation state.

With that said what gets said, WAPO reported:

President Donald Trump told reporters Tuesday that he had “no intention” of firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell, comments that came despite his increased criticism of Powell in recent days. During the Oval Office event that served as a public swearing-in of SEC Chair Paul Atkins, Trump also said he expected that U.S. tariffs on goods from China would eventually come down “substantially,” but cautioned they wouldn’t be lowered to zero. Earlier in the day, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is “doing a tremendous job” and that Trump “stands strongly behind him,” as questions swirled around Hegseth’s leadership of the Pentagon.

No clue what any of this means and how he’s gonna get the Tariffs to reduce.

Dafuq.

For the record, I use signal, have for years, I even donate to the signal foundation.

What matters is that your wife is happy.

Is this the car your wife would have picked or…

I was just expecting the CEO of a ED pill manufacturer to be considering a BMW, Lexus, MBZ, perhaps a G Wagon, or just have James pick you up with the Caddy instead of a Subaru. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

So is Iran…

... connecting the story line dots ...

@ASV_Vites uses a special formula get out of jail card?
:smirking_face:

It’s a circular assertion, because one would go poor trying to stay high enough to like a Subaru, removing the financial possibility of not owning said Subaru.
Don’t get me wrong, Mini, Jaguar and Land Rover owners are high on their own british snobbery to not care, so each has their own vice. :rofl: :rofl: