NSFE: Amamods bragging about helping while directly ignoring

[papy]

There’s a topic on the NSFE about Amazon Accelerate. It’s a thread by a CMT, with many CMT responses, about a “Forum Lounge” at Accelerate. Someone mentioned how “closely” the CMTs monitor the NSFE.

Buried in the replies is this excellent post from a Seller.
A reply to the CMT OP. Where other CMTs have replied to others, no tags. ZERO RESPONSES. 5 DAYS.

Pathetic that they will take time to pat themselves on the baxk and gaslight about their NSFE engagement, instead of tackling real Seller problems.

Seller_ifgPAjrjXQ5iR

In reply to: [Micah_Amazon’s post]
5 days ago

Is the group going to cover companies claiming to be Registered Brands on products they don’t own the TM for and being approved for this? Once approved it makes it very difficult to accelerate your growth in Amazon’s stores. How do we as sellers navigate the unwillingness of Brand Registry to act? How does Amazon suggest we move forward once a product has been hijacked (for lack of a better term)?

h/t @dwat0870 at Amazon Accelerate 2023 - #3 by dwat0870

[GGX]

These days on Amazon, either you’ve learned how to game the system of bots + indian seller performance employees, or you haven’t and you’re screwed because there’s no real person to help you.

The forum mods there are the sorriest sacks of ■■■■ i’ve ever seen in my life. Like 90% of their posts are downvoted because they’re useless.

[papy]

I hate that because that Seller has really good questions.

Amazon absolutely penalizes those of us who play by the rules.

[papy]

@papy

I hate that because that Seller has really good questions.

Any advice for the OP?

@papy

Is the group going to cover companies claiming to be Registered Brands on products they don’t own the TM for and being approved for this? Once approved it makes it very difficult to accelerate your growth in Amazon’s stores. How do we as sellers navigate the unwillingness of Brand Registry to act? How does Amazon suggest we move forward once a product has been hijacked (for lack of a better term)?

Reminds me of this situation with @A162: Brand registration