This reduces support costs while encouraging sellers to hand money to buyers in an attempt to meet the extortion demands that I’m sure YouTubers are already circulating tutorials about. Now there’s a feedback only buyers can remove, and they’ll need some incentive to do so. I don’t see the problem.
I don’t know this for a fact obviously, but “all FBA sellers are even” when it comes to winning the buy box has largely been true in the past, and Amazon themselves have stated that all metrics are considered perfect if you use FBA.
All FBA sellers are not created equal. Available quantity and FC location play a part as does FB (from tests I did way back) on which seller wins. I don’t think it’s changed.
I’ll say though that I’ve never heard Amazon say anything about winning the BB that I can recall, and it’s sure not documented anywhere that I now of.
Certainly some Amazonian might have said something like that, but as we Sellers know all too well, very few Amazonians know what they’re talking about when it comes to the Merchant experience.
Thanks to an NSFE discussion (Seller with possible fake feedback [link]) posted earlier today (28Dec23), I ran across multiple obviously-legitimate (/sarc) cases of this in the Seller Feedback of this 3P Seller:
Exactly this. The vast majority of our negative seller feedback have been product reviews. Easily removable. Not anymore I guess. We probably only sell about 800 orders per ODR lookback period. Just a few of these can really dig into that rating.
According to several Facebook selling groups, Amazon has rescinded the Star Only Feedback policy and removed the language about those feedbacks being ineligible for strikethrough / removal.
I think that’s the quickest clawback I’ve ever seen from Amazon. Policy walk backs are really rare on Amazon, but they’ve done it at least twice in the past 6 months - the other one being charging a surcharge for sellers using Seller Fulfilled Prime.
A thread on all of the Amazon policy / fee reversals would be fun. I can only recall 4 in 20+ years.
It’s crazy that they get all the feedback struck out even though it’s clearly seller faulted. Setting a 14 day handling time is completely unreasonable for what they’re selling.
I know I use this guy as an example a lot, but it’s basically the perfect example of a fraud that figured out a way to do it while taking advantage of flaws like how strikethroughs are issued.